I recently posted an article on the
dropping velocity of money, a rather odd occurrence given that the Federal
Reserve has been pumping and dumping as much "cash" as the system can
handle in an effort to stimulate economic growth. Various measures of
the money supply have increased dramatically over the past five years since the
Fed began QE 1 in November 2008 especially when one looks back at their growth
rate back to the mid-1970s.
Here's what has happened to M1:
Here is the percentage change of M1
on a year-over-year basis:
As you can see, on average, M1 has
grown at a far higher rate since the end of the Great Recession than it has
since the mid-1970s and it has done so for a far longer period of time.
At its post-Great Recession peak in October 2012, M1 was growing at a rather
frightening 22.5 percent on an annual basis, a record level of growth when
looking back to the mid-1970s.
Here's what has happened to M2:
Here is the percentage change of M2
on a year-over-year basis:
While the growth in M2 was not as
dramatic as the growth in M1, it still grew at an elevated rate of around 10
percent for a nine month period between August 2011 and June 2012 and has since
dropped back to the still rather high level of 6.7 percent on a a
year-over-year basis.
Now, why should we be concerned
about all of this? Right now, the velocity of money is very low meaning
that all the money that the Fed is "printing" is not being spent as
many times as it normally would as shown on this graph:
In fact, M2 is being spent at
historically low levels looking all the way back to the late 1950s.
Now that we have that behind us, the
problem will occur when consumers decide that they want to spend all of that
wonderful money that Mr. Bernanke and his merry band of bankers have printed,
toiling long hours over their overheated printing presses (kind of conjures up
a Dickensian novel, doesn't it?). When (if) consumers start spending and
demand for goods and services rises, all of those dollars will be chasing a
finite number of goods and services, pushing inflation (CPI) out of its current
rather tame range as shown here:
A recent brief by Dr. Steven Cunningham, Chief
Economist at the American Institute for Economic Research suggests that the
economy may be showing the initial signs of inflation in the economy. He
notes that several key factors in the private sector are creating fuel for
inflation as follows:
1.) The rise in overall capacity
utilization: As shown on this graph, overall capacity utilization has grown to its
post-Great Recession high of 77.8 percent:
The current level of utilization is
up markedly from its 45 year low of 66.9 percent experienced in June 2009.
Once overall capacity utilization reaches 80 percent or more,
inflationary pressures tend to build in the economy.
2.) The rise in the producer price
index (PPI): As shown on this graph, the PPI is now very close to its
highest level since the end of the Great Recession and is around the the level
seen as the recession set in during 2009:
In fact, the PPI has risen
from a low of 168.1 in March 2009 to its current level of 204.3, a rather
substantial gain. August 2013 saw the PPI for finished goods (mainly
energy and consumer foods) rise by an annualized rate of 3.7 percent. Finished
energy prices rose by 10.5 percent on an annualized basis and finished consumer
food prices rose by 7.3 percent on an annualized basis, led by a 26.9 percent
increase in fresh and dry vegetable prices.
The saving grace has been consumer
spending. As shown on this graph, consumer spending has been dropping for
much of the past year, however, it seems to have stabilized or risen slightly
since April 2013:
While consumer confidence has not
reached the levels seen during previous recoveries, it is in the neighbourhood
of the highest levels it has seen since 2008 as shown here:
As economists point out, it takes
both demand and money to create inflation. The money has already been
created, thanks to the Fed, with the monetary base up an annually compounded
rate of 36.3 percent over the past year alone. Banks are now holding 3500 percent of their reserve
requirements rather than the 1 or 2 percent that they normally hold, showing
that they are not lending at anything that would approach their normal lending rate. This tells us that there
is a huge potential buildup of both lending and money circulation that could
take place. When that happens, it could happen very quickly and the
pressure could result in severe inflationary pressures in the economy.
Everything is in place for the next round of high inflation, the only thing missing is consumer demand. It's just a
matter of waiting until consumers have the confidence and desire to consume and decide that they want to borrow and spend at the same time as banks decide that they want to make money lending to consumers. Then all inflation hell could break loose.
How can the average American consume when (I don’t know the number) but most of the people I know live roughly pay check to pay check? The stagnant wages have created this issue. All the money is concentrated at the top with the lower portion not having much extra to spend other than on things of importance.
ReplyDeleteAt some point, spending is going to have to resume simply because things break down, as they are meant to (planned obsolescense). People will be stuck financially but the banks will be happy to help 'cause they'll be able to lend all this pent-up money. They will lend this "fake" money (printed but backed by nothing) and in return they'll get real money from the working Joe. The game will resume, wether the sheeple and debt slaves like it, or want it, or not. What might change the game is that people eventually stop pursuing happiness through stuff; others start up businesses that build useful things of quality for a simpler living arrangement; things like that.
ReplyDeleteSo, we might yet see bubbles again from some sectors of the economy, the top 1% getting richer and the average person of course, getting poorer. Then another crash or recession - they seem to be cyclic, then the whole thing starts up again. Just look at the short history of fracking...
While charts can be very enlightening I caution those looking at them that they can also be very deceiving, the scale and what they don"t show is very important. While proving the surge in new money these charts may understate the feel of how much the money supply has grown in relation to the past.
ReplyDeleteAfter much thought I have come to the conclusion that while inflation is not showing up in a big way the seeds have been planted, and the number of them is somewhat shocking. Inflation lurks beneath the surface and is hidden away in the dark corners of our future. Want to know where the real cost of things is going, just look at the replacement cost from recent storms and natural disasters. More about this "hidden" inflation in the post below,
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/06/inflation-lurks-beneath-and-hidden.html
Of course high inflation is coming. That is what the FED and the GOV is trying to make. Why? Because it is the easiest way to create the perception of growth. Remember the official inflation numbers are manipulated down. Inflated prices push the GDP higher. Although the real GDP might be falling, the inflated one will be seen as rising.
ReplyDeleteIt appears that the money supply is not lying idle in the US banks. It is diverted and put to work in the developing countries.
ReplyDeleteThey are the ones where the money grows. US businesses and people simply cannot provide comparable returns. This is why everything is quiet and nothing changes in the US. All the changes are in the developing countries.
All the talk coming from Fed barely creates a stir in the US markets. But look at the reaction in India, China and Brazil. It's staggering.
The question now: how will this money tsunami sloshing around the globe affect the US, and when?