In searching for
information on Ebola, I happened to find this rather old (1995) article on the transmission of Ebola (Zaire),
the species of Ebola that is responsible for the current outbreak in Africa and
the cases in North America. The article by Dr. N Jaax, a
veterinarian and his colleagues, was released December 1995 in "The Lancet", a
renowned medical periodical, and provided a glimpse of how the Ebola virus could be
transmitted through the air, a contrast to the widely held and much propagated
theory that Ebola is spread only through direct contact with an infected
person's bodily fluids.
The authors begin by
noting that the the route of infection for human filovirus exposures is
unknown. As we've been repeatedly told, close contact with vomit, blood, diarrhea, tissue and improper medical hygiene are the main routes by which Ebola spreads from person to person. The importance of aerosols, a system of liquid or solid particles that are suspended in air, has been little studied in the transmission of Ebola.
The authors reported that
a secondary transmission of Ebola took place in a laboratory where both
experimentally infected and non-infected (the control group) rhesus monkeys
were held. The monkeys were part of an experiment that was design to
evaluate the therapeutic value of alpha-interferon in the fight against Ebola
(Zaire). The two groups of monkeys had no physical contact with each
other, in fact, they were housed in stainless steel cages located approximately
3 metres or 10 feet from each other. The first of the inoculated monkeys
died 7 days after infection and the last died 13 days after infection. At
that point, the control group monkeys appeared to be entirely normal with no
signs of hemorrhagic fever. Two of the three control monkeys became infected
and died from the Ebola virus; the first died 10 days after the last
experimentally infected monkey died (22 days after the inoculation of the
experimentally infected monkeys) and the second died the following day.
Necropsies showed that the control monkeys had large amounts of Ebola
virus present throughout their organs, including the liver, spleen, lymph
nodes, adrenal gland, small intestine, kidneys and lungs.
The scientists involved
were extremely cautious about the procedures used during this experiment; cages
were cleaned using Lysol and low-pressure water to minimize the creation of
aerosols. All cleaning procedures were carried out first on the cages
containing the control animals to ensure that the Ebola virus was not
inadvertently transmitted to them. As well, all blood testing and viral
swab sampling were performed first on the control monkeys, again, to ensure
that there was no cross contamination. The laboratory procedures used in
this experiment had been used by the same lab in other experiments and had
successfully prevented the transmission of Ebola and Marburg viruses to
uninfected animals.
Here is the authors'
conclusion:
"The exact mode of transmission to the control
monkeys cannot be absolutely determined, although the pattern of pulmonary
(lung) antigen staining in one of the control monkeys was virtually identical
to that reported in experimental Ebola virus aerosol transmission of the
disease via infectious droplets.
While airborne
transmission of Ebola hemorrhagic fever has not been documented in humans,
only limited tissues have been available for complete virological and
histopathological examinations. Our present findings emphasize
the advisability of at-risk personnel employing precautions to safeguard
against ocular, oral and nasopharyngeal exposure to the virus....These data
also suggest potential avenues of exploration regarding the routes of
infection for index human cases of Ebola fever, which remains a mystery."
(my bold)
Given my previous posting
on the airborne spread of Ebola over a 15 centimetre or 6 inch gap between
infected and non-infected laboratory animals, I found it rather stunning that
nearly 20 years ago, scientists had observed that Ebola (Zaire) appeared to
spread over a 3 metre or 10 foot gap between infected and non-infected animals.
If the aerosol theory is correct and is responsible for at least some of
the secondary Ebola infections in Africa, it will be almost impossible to
control given how many times daily humans are in contact that is closer than 10
feet, particularly in a hospital or even an urban setting.
Should you happen to want
to read the entire document, it was a bit difficult to find more than just the
abstract so here is a screen capture of all three pages:
In case you were
hopeful, the study also proved that interferon was ineffective at controlling
Ebola.
Charming bits of information. We may yet return to the 14th century. Republicans want us to go back to the 18th; Putin to the 19th but the decision may be taken for us.
ReplyDelete....and obama and the democrats think we live in a political fairy land where one can throw out political propaganda pixie dust and Ebola "goes away." This is what happens when overgrown leftist children run the country.
Delete