Now that Iran has signed
a deal with P5+1, it is a good time to take a look at a recent speech given by
Iran's Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Khamenei. This
speech was delivered on July 4, 2015 at a meeting of university professors and
can be found on the English language website "The Center for Preserving and Publishing the Works of
Grand Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei".
Let's look at a bit of background about Iran's current Supreme Leader. In Iran, the dominant figure in the nation's political sphere is not the president (currently reformist Hassan Rouhani) but the Supreme Leader who has authority over all major state institutions. The 75-year-old cleric wields ultimate power in the Islamic Republic, becoming Iran's religious leader after the death of Ayatollah Khomeini, the man who lead the 1979 revolution that overthrew the pro-Western Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi. He was a student of Imam Khomeini and spent much of his youth and young adulthood studying Islamic law. He has been arrested and imprisoned six times. In 1976, the Pahlavi regime apprehended him and sentenced him to exile for three years. Upon his returned, he became one of the founders of the Islamic Republic Party and has held many positions within the government including Secretary of Defense. An assassination attempt in 1982 left him handicapped. He was chosen Supreme Leader by the Council of Experts in 1990. It is interesting to see that he has adopted 21st century technology, even having a Twitter account as shown here:
The speech focused on the
importance of educating Iran's youth by the nation's 70,000 university
professors, both morally and academically. Here is a quote:
"Naturally, teaching is accompanied by the
possibility of moral education. So, this opportunity should be seized. If our
university professors are religious and if they enjoy national zeal,
revolutionary motives and the spirit to do hard work, this will naturally be
transferred to their students."
The Grand Ayatollah goes
on to outline the importance of a scientific education, noting that "...according to global statistics, the
scientific growth rate of the country is 13 times faster than the global
average...", resulting in Iran ranking 16th in the world in the area
of science. He goes on to discuss Iran's budget for research, stating
that four percent of Iran's overall budget was specified for research,
well above the less than one percent current being allocated. Since Iran
currently does not have the funds to increase their budget for scientific
research, he states that the research budget allocation should range
between 1.5 and 2 percent.
Now that we have a bit of
background, let's get to the meat of the speech:
"As a number of friends pointed out in their
speeches, the goal of the enemies of the Iranian nation is to prevent our
country and people from achieving their true civilizational position. They felt
that this movement has begun in the country and this is why they have imposed
sanctions on us. I too believe that sanctions were not imposed because of the
nuclear issue, the issue of human rights and the issue of terrorism....
They [the Americans and
westerners] themselves are terrorists. They themselves are opposed to human
rights. Are they pressuring a country only for the sake of human rights? The
issue is not this. There are more important calculations behind this issue. A people,
a movement and an identity have come into being that pivot around principles
opposed to those of global arrogance and the oppressor-oppressed system. They
do not want this to develop. We are in such a condition. We are in such a
position. Therefore, we should move forward and work hard.
Of course, sanctions
create some problems, but they cannot prevent our progress. In order to achieve progress, we should use our capacities
and you university professors can play your part in this regard. The Ministry
of Science and those ministries that are in charge of scientific affairs have
fundamental and important roles. You should appreciate the value of these roles
and you should follow them. You should ask Allah the Exalted for help as well.
The holy ayah that the friends recited - "If you help the cause of Allah,
He will help you."
Now, let's look back at another speech given by the Supreme Leader
in April 2011. This speech provided the leader's view of the nation’s nuclear
prgram and is quite interesting given the current scenario:
"If advanced knowledge were at the disposal
of a perfect and moral nation, it would be a source of blessings. If modern
weapons were at the disposal of a wise and perfect nation, they would not pose
any dangers. The situation will always be like this. They produce atomic bombs
– just as what the Americans did at the end of the Second World War and the
tragedy that they caused for the people of Japan. Similarly, the nuclear
disaster in one of the Soviet Union’s nuclear power plants led to the death of
a large number of people. If something bad comes out of nuclear technology, it
is all because of the unrestrained power of the superpowers. If the power of
the arrogant US government is restricted in the world, nuclear threats will
decrease automatically.
The word atom is associated with the progress of human
knowledge, but unfortunately it is equally associated with the most hideous
event in history and the greatest genocide and misuse of the scientific
achievements of humanity. Although many countries have taken action to
manufacture and stockpile nuclear weapons - which in itself can be considered a
preface to committing crimes and is a serious threat to global peace - there is
only one government that has committed a nuclear crime so far. Only the
government of the United States of America has waged an atomic war against the
oppressed people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in an unfair and inhumane war....
Much to the disappointment of the enemies, the Islamic
Republic of Iran achieved nuclear technology on its own. Iran has been a member
of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and it has signed the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty. According to the regulations, they were supposed to
provide Iran with certain kinds of help. Influential Zionists and Americans
told the world not to help Iran. Talented Iranian youth and scientists managed
to achieve this technology gradually without the help of others. Nuclear
technology is different from building atomic bombs. Achieving nuclear
technology constitutes scientific growth in a field that offers many different
advantages. Those who are after building an atomic bomb can achieve their goal
by following a certain branch of nuclear technology. Iran is not after an
atomic bomb, and it is even opposed to possession of chemical weapons. Even
when Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, we did not try to manufacture
chemical weapons. Such things are not in line with the principles of the
Islamic Republic of Iran...
The Americans should know that the Islamic Republic of Iran
is not a warmonger. Acting on the basis of its principles, the Islamic Republic
is opposed to warmongering. Iran does not welcome war. Everybody should know
this. This is the position that all officials of the Islamic Republic
unanimously agree on. All government officials of the Islamic Republic consider
avoidance of war as their responsibility. Islamic principles require Iran to
present a message of friendship, peace, love, security and tranquility. This is
because the Iranian nation has something to say. Those do not have anything to
say would naturally create uproar so that nobody can listen. It is bullying
people who would want to create uproar, but those who have logical reasons to
present would want a peaceful atmosphere in which they can present their
logical reasons.
They mix up nuclear technology with development of nuclear
weapons. The truth is different from what they say. Nuclear technology and
nuclear weapons are two different things which are not closely related to one
another. Nuclear weapons are based on uranium that is enriched above 90 percent
through the use of complex technologies. Only those who have the motivation
will go after nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran does not have
this motivation, and it has never been after nuclear weapons. Iran does not
need a nuclear bomb. Iran has overcome its enemies so far without depending on
nuclear weapons. The Iranian nation has continually defeated America for
several years. Is this not true? Did Iran defeat America relying on its nuclear
weapons or did it defeat America relying on its determination, willpower,
faith, awareness and unity? Iran knew what it wanted, and it knew how to get
it. Iran moved in this direction and was not intimidated by the threats of
other people. This was how Iran overcame its enemy. It did not use nuclear
weapons to overcome its enemy. Did the Soviet Union not have atomic bombs? Its
atomic bombs were probably more than the atomic bombs of America, yet it was
defeated. Defeat and victory in important areas are not determined by such
things.”
It is interesting to see
that Iran's Supreme Leader, the man ultimately responsible for making the
decision to create an Iranian nuclear weapon, has been unequivocal about Iran's
future with nuclear weapons in the past, just as he is unequivocal about the
role of the United States and its allies in a nuclear world. Only time will tell whether or not Iran was
sincere in its pursuit of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes alone.
One way or another America must deal with Iran. Six world powers have reached an agreement with Iran on its disputed nuclear program after years of talks. A little research shows that Iran has good reason not to trust the American government. Our foreign policy has reeked havoc upon many countries, but few societies have been effected or suffered from our meddling as much as Iran. Those who are skeptical and view this as a weak agreement say Obama has again backed down again. An interesting thought to consider is Iran holds more cards than you might think because of ISIS.
ReplyDeleteOne might say Iran holds the fate of Baghdad in their hands. If the Shia militias from Iran that are currently defending Baghdad waver both the Iraqi capital and the American Green Zone could come under fire from ISIS, this would be very embarrassing for Obama and our government. The bottom-line remains that if Iran does not halt and reverse its course any agreement means nothing. Iran can always ramp up its plans to develop a nuclear bomb at off site locations. The fact is if current trends continue in the future Iran looks to face a defanged and economically weakened America with less power in the region. Regardless it appears one way or the other we must deal with Iran. The article below delves into our history with Iran and where we go from here.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2015/08/we-must-deal-with-iran.html