A fascinating
brief by Mark Muro, Senior
Fellow at the Brookings Institute takes a unique look at one of the key issues
facing American workers (and other workers in developed nations); automation,
particularly the growing use of industrial robots in the workplace.
Mr.
Muro's analysis looks at the geographic distribution of industrial robots which
he defines as "automatically controlled, reprogrammable machines that are
capable of replacing labor in a range of tasks". If you want to get
a sense of how pervasive robotics are in some industries, here is a video showing Telsa's use of robots in its
manufacturing operations at Fremont:
As
you can see, in the case of Tesla, a great deal of the manufacturing process is
handled by industrial robots.
Using
data from economists Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo which looked at sales
data for robotics, Mr. Muro was able to calculate the number of industrial
robots per thousand workers in U.S. metropolitan areas and then plot them on a
map as such:
In
total, in 2015, there were 233,305 industrial robots in use across the United States.
As you can see, the incidence of industrial robots is not evenly
dispersed across the United States, rather, robots are concentrated in the
Midwest and Southern states and to some degree in California, in fact, more than half of the
robots are located in 10 states led by Michigan with nearly 28,000 robots (12
percent of the nation's total) followed by Ohio with 20,400 robots (8.7 percent
of the nation's total) and Indiana with 19,400 robots (8.3 percent of the
nation's total).
Despite
the general decline in its economy, Detroit had 15,115 robots in 2015, up from 5,753 in
2010 with 8.5 robots per thousand workers giving it the distinction of
having, by a wide margin, the most robots of any other metropolitan area in the
United States. Here is a list showing the largest metropolitan areas with
the most and least robots per thousand workers:
As
you can see when you examine the column showing the annualized percentage
change in total robots between 2010 and 2015, there has been rather explosive
growth in the use of industrial robots with some areas seeing a near tripling
of the number of robots used over the five year period.
In
case you thought that only large metropolitan areas were impacted by the use of
robots, some smaller towns and cities scattered throughout the former
industrial heartland have even more intensively adopted robots. Elkhart
County in Indiana had a total of 4,355 robots in 2015, up from 1,778 in 2010 and
has a robot-to-thousand workers ratio of 35.9 to one. The city of Kokomo
in Indiana is not far behind with a robot-to-thousand workers ratio of 35.2 to
one, however, it had only 1,274 robots or less than one-third of Elkhart
County's total.
What
is fascinating about this analysis is the explosive growth in the use of industrial
robots over the past five years. It is no wonder that workers in many
industries are feeling threatened, that is, if they still have their jobs.
Much of Corporate America seems to be fully embracing the use of robots;
they don't join unions, they don't require bathroom or lunch breaks, they don't
call in sick and they don't require their employer to spend money on raises,
funding pensions or health care. In so many ways, it is easy to see why
the post-Great Recession improvement in employment has had a very variable
impact on American workers and why this recovery feels so different than other
post-recessional economic expansions and perhaps, why Donald Trump attracted millions of voters. The expansion in the use of robots
has displaced hundreds of thousands of workers who used to be able to count on
a lifetime of work and has, no doubt, had a significant impact on what those
who have retained their jobs can expect to earn one the long run.
No comments:
Post a Comment