A brief
section entitled "Has the Search for Yield Gone Too Far" in the IMF's
most recent Global Financial Stability Report provides
investors with a summary of all that is wrong in the global bond market today.
and why investors must be wary.
As all investors know, the current
extended period of ultra-low interest rates has pushed investors to "seek
yield". This means that in order to get a decent return on an
investment, investors have had to take on additional levels of risk, risk that they
may not ordinarily have been willing to take. For example, investors that
normally invested in the "safest assets" (at least in the eyes of the
market) like ten-year Treasuries, have seen the yield do this since the Great Recession began:
In order to get a return that meets
traditional expectations, fixed income investors may have invested in higher
risk corporate junk bonds which have a higher yield as shown here:
The IMF notes that the global
universe of fixed income products looks far different than it did before the
Great Recession. While the investment grade fixed income market has
mushroomed from $19.5 trillion in 2007 to $45.7 trillion in 2017, the portion
of bonds that yield over 4 percent has dropped from 80 percent in 2007 to less
than 5 percent as shown here:
In fact, of the $45.7 trillion in
investment grade fixed income investments, only $1.8 trillion have a yield of
over 4 percent, down from $15.8 trillion in 2007.
This has created a dynamic shift in
the bond market. Foreign investors have shifted away from their
traditional investments in U.S. Treasuries into higher-yielding U.S. corporate
bonds with non-U.S. investors now holding nearly 30 percent of U.S. corporate
debt, up from 12 percent and1990 and up 25 percent from before the Great
Recession.
Not only has the search for yield
impacted the U.S. corporate bond market, it has had a profound impact on the issuance of
debt by the world's emerging market economies. The current prolonged
period of ultra-low interest rates has led to increased borrowing by many of
the world's lower-rated nation as shown here:
...and here:
What is not terribly surprising is,
that with the desperate search for yield, non-resident investors are buying
increasing volumes of higher-risk emerging market debt since the Great
Recession as shown here in billions of U.S. dollars:
...and here shown as a percentage
of GDP:
In the first eight months of 2017,
non-resident investors picked up $205 billion of emerging market debt, the
highest level since 2015 and 2016 and 2017 looks set to approach the levels last
seen during the period from 2010 to 2014.
The great concern about the move by
investors into lower-rated debt issued by nations with questionable economic
futures is that the level of interest owing on the increased level of
outstanding debt has risen substantially when measured against revenues as
shown here:
It is also concerning that the
demand for lower-rated debt has pushed the spread in bond yields (i.e.
the risk premium) between emerging market nations and higher-rated U.S. debt as
shown here:
The global bond market is no longer
reflecting the level of risk that investors face when buying debt from emerging
market nations, nations that will likely face debt crises similar to the PIIGS
crisis back in the first half of the current decade. In fact, if you want
a sense for how the debt market has lost its way and no longer reflects reality, look no further than the
yields on the following PIIGS debt (2 year bonds):
It is hard to imagine that either
nations' fiscal picture has improved to the point where the yield on their 2
year debt should be either negative (Italy) or just below 1.75 percent (Greece).
Let's close this posting with a
quote from the IMF on the current search for yield:
"The low-interest-rate
environment has stimulated a search for yield in markets, pushing investors
beyond their traditional risk mandates. This has compressed spreads, reduced
the compensation for credit and market risk in bond markets, contributed to low
volatility, and facilitated the use of financial leverage. While these supportive financial
conditions have helped boost growth, as intended, they have also raised the
sensitivity of the financial system to market risks. Prolonged normalization of monetary
policy could extend these trends. Unless
well managed, these rising medium-term vulnerabilities could lead to
significant market disruptions if risk premiums and volatility decompress
rapidly." (my bold)
In other words, investors beware.
You have been lulled into a false sense of bond market security. This time is not different; high risk debt is still high risk debt no matter what yield may suggest and the odds of a cascade of defaults is certain to rise over time, leaving investors with a very uncomfortable haircut.
The former chief economist of the Bank for International Settlements recently issued a warning that global financial markets were not on sound footing. He told Bloomberg "the system is dangerously unanchored."
ReplyDeleteDuring that interview, White pointed out that Europe's creditors are likely to face some of the biggest haircuts. The following article argues that central banks have only postponed the inevitable by continuing to print money and expanding the monetary base.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2017/09/former-bis-chief-system-dangerously.html