Thanks to
another Freedom of Information Act lawsuit launched by Judicial Watch on May
5, 2015, we now have an even better idea of what happened to those State
Department non-"state.gov." emails of Hillary Clinton's and her
right-hand assistant, Huma Abedin. In this release, conveniently dated
December 29th, 2017 when no one was paying attention because of the Christmas break, the State Department released an additional 139 work-related documents from Huma Abedin that were found on her former
husband's, the aptly named Anthony Weiner, laptop. Despite this
protestation by Ms. Clinton during the 2016 Presidential election:
"Classified material has a
header which says ‘top-secret, secret, confidential.’ Nothing, and I will
repeat this and this is verified in the report by the Department of Justice,
none of the emails sent or received by me had such a header."
...it
appears that, at the very least, sensitive information did pass through her
personal server to her aide, Ms. Abedin and onward to the laptop of Anthony
Weiner, a civilian who was not cleared to view any confidential State
Department documents/emails. As such, let's take a look at a handful of
the emails from Huma Abedin that were found on Mr. Weiner's laptop:
1.) Email
dated July 9, 2011 to Hillary Clinton regarding the Secretary's Call Sheet for
a telephone call to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
You will
notice that the contents of the entire email which was originally classified as
"Confidential" have been redacted.
2.) Email
dated November 25, 2011 from Alice Wells regarding an update on the talks
between Hamas - PLO talks:
In this
case, while the document is considered "unclassified" by the State
Department, the entire contents have been deemed too sensitive for release to
the public.
3.) Email
dated August 22, 2011 from Monica Hanley regarding the Secretary's Call Sheet
for a telephone call to Libya's Transitional Council Chairman, Abdel Jalil:
Again,
while the document is considered "unclassified", other than a brief
mention of the purpose of the call, the remainder of the email is considered to
be too sensitive to release to the public.
4.) Email
dated March 9, 2011 going back and forth between Hillary Clinton and Huma
Abedin to regarding "Tomorrow" with most of the contents redacted:
Let's look
at three examples of what was fully released or very slightly redacted:
Thus far,
the vast majority of Huma Abedin's 139 work-related emails that ended up on her
husband's laptop are completely innocuous, at least to the untrained eye,
however, there are a significant number that have been subjected to significant
redaction, suggesting that the Clinton personal email server issue was far more
serious than the Democrat's candidate for POTUS would have had us believe
during the 2016 campaign. Apparently, the contents of some of the emails
that had no security classification whatsoever are still deemed, at least by
the State Department, as too sensitive for the sweaty voting masses.
No comments:
Post a Comment