Thursday, May 20, 2021

Partnering with the Wuhan Institute of Virology - Rats and a Sinking Ship

While the World Health Organization and its Global Study of the Origins of SARS-CoV-2 report has exonerated the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the source of the current COVID-19 pandemic as shown here:


...and with last April's announcement of the cancellation of funding by the National Institutes of Health for the bat coronavirus research project as shown here:


...and with the recent exchange between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Senator Rand Paul at the May 11, 2021 Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions hearing as shown here: is interesting to see how things have changed on the website of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the organization very close to the centre of the pandemic.


Thanks to the Wayback Machine, here is a screen capture from the Wuhan Institute of Virology's website from March 1, 2021 showing the Institute's partnerships:


Here's what the same webpage looks like now:



Notice that all of the American partners, with the exception of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based international nonprofit focussing on research to prevent pandemics, have disappeared into the ether and that only two European partners remain; INSERM or Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale aka the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and the Lyon P4 Laboratory, the only BSL4 laboratory operating in France.


Like rats abandoning a sinking ship....or, more likely, a series of partners that don't want their organizations tarnished by any association with what still could turn out to be the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

1 comment:

  1. The U.S. govt poisons the reputation of an organization, organizations are then scared out of working with them, and then we use the fact that their reputation has been ruined as prima facie evidence that they are guilty of something. This is psyops 101

    Was there an alarm bell in the WHO report that you wanted to call out? Their argument seemed straightforward for an initial assessment.
    1. We did not find any samples that matched the virus.
    2. We did not find any employees coming down with symptoms in the expected time frame.

    The interesting thing is that the State Dept claims that 19 workers got influenza in Sept. and then said 'aha' and not one in our MSM asked any follow up questions, did any of them die, what about Oct, Nov, Dec. Out of how many employees?