Now that the Federal Reserve is
considering when to "taper" its purchases of mortgage-backed
securities and Treasuries, it's time to take a look at just how effective Mr.
Bernanke's experiment has been.
First, let's look at how QE has
impacted the Federal Reserve and its balance sheet under Mr. Bernanke's
leadership:
Since August 8, 2007, the Fed's
balance sheet has grown from $869 billion to its current level of $3.453
trillion as shown on this statistical release:
As of June 12, 2013, the Fed is the
lucky owner of $1.903 trillion worth of U.S. Treasuries. According to
SIFMA, there were $11.390 trillion worth of outstanding Treasury Securities of
all types at the end of April 2013, meaning that the Fed is now holding 16.7
percent of the United States debt (excluding debt owed by one arm of the government
to another).
Now, let's use some graphs from FRED
to show just how effective Mr. Bernanke's policies have been and whether the
risks taken to prod the economy back to life after the Great Recession have
been worth it. For this posting, I'll focus on the issues that concern
Main Street the most; jobs, compensation for those jobs and personal net worth.
Please also notice that the start date for each graph is November 2007,
the last month of the previous economy growth cycle since according to NBER, the
Great Recession commenced in December 2007.
First, let's look at the unemployment rate:
In November 2007, the unemployment
rate was an unbelievable 4.7 percent. Four years into the recovery it
sits at 7.6 percent.
Here is a look at the average duration of unemployment:
In November 2007, the average
American worker was unemployed for a period of only 17.3 weeks before finding a
new job opportunity. Four years into the recovery, an average American
finds himself or herself without work for 36.9 weeks, over twice as long as
before the Great Recession.
Here is a look at the number of
American civilians unemployed for 27 weeks and longer:
In November 2007, 1.374 million
Americans were unemployed for 27 weeks and longer. Four years into the
recovery, it sits at 4.357 million, over 3 times as many as before the Great
Recession.
Here is a look at our personal
bottom line, showing what has happened to real hourly compensation since November 2007:
The index sat at 102.041 at the
beginning of the Great Recession and, four years into the recovery, has grown
by a tiny fraction to 102.524. For the six decades before the last
recession, growth in real compensation was generally steady, particularly in the
1960s and 1990s. Not so now!
Lastly, here is a look at what has
happened to the net worth of households and non-profit organizations:
At the beginning of the Great
Recession, the total net worth of American households et al was $64.153
trillion. Four years after the end of the recession, this has grown to
$70.349 trillion, an increase of only 9.7 percent over a 5 year period.
No wonder we aren't feeling particularly "flush with cash"!
One can quite quickly see that,
while there has definitely been improvement in the U.S. economy since the
depths of the Great Recession, despite the "heroic" efforts of the
Federal Reserve, this recovery is far different than previous recoveries if,
indeed, one can call it a recovery at all. While the Great Recession was
far deeper than previous incarnations, it's obvious that the Fed's trial
economic medications have been less than completely successful. It will
be most interesting to see what happens when the doctor (Mr. Bernanke) weans
the patient (the economy) from the current course of treatment.
When you write that as of June, 2013, the Fed owned $1.903 trillion of Treasuries, which is 16.7% of U.S. debt, are you saying that the Fed's Treasury asset has a corresponding lia bility - debt held by the public?
ReplyDeleteIf true, the debt is no different than when China buys Treasuries. For their asset the Treasury, the debt held by the U.S. public increases.
If true, where do we get this money printing idea, that suggests money is expanding without accountability?
Don Levit
Hi Don
DeleteWhat concerns me is that the Fed now has its own fiscal health in mind; since its balance sheet is bloated with Treasuries like never before, the bottom line of the Fed is impacted by its own interest rate policies. As interest rates rise, the value of the Fed's balance sheet will drop and, as I've noted before, this drop could be drastic. Historically, this is unprecedented and we really have no idea what the repercussions could be.
Thanks for your input.
Found your post on Bloomberg.
ReplyDeleteGood stuff.
We are Tea Teams USA and we a looking for people with brains to join us.
We are taking the fight to the people in the streets and online with video like this guy Wild Bill.
http://youtu.be/RQjJoWewvQg
join us - you are welcome here