Updated April 2014
According to a study by the Government Accountability Institute, three American institutions make a pretty decent profit from American's hunger. In this posting, I will focus on one of those corporations.
According to a study by the Government Accountability Institute, three American institutions make a pretty decent profit from American's hunger. In this posting, I will focus on one of those corporations.
Let's open by looking at the growth
in the number of America's using food stamps also known as the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP and the number of Americans that have incomes at 130 percent of the poverty line after the Great Recession:
According to the USDA,
the number of participants grew from 33.49 million in fiscal 2009 to 47.64
million in fiscal 2013, an increase of 42.2 percent.
Other than SNAP beneficiaries who
get an average $133.07 per month per person, who is
benefitting from SNAP? Why, it's none other than JP Morgan through its
Electronic Financial Services subsidiary and two other companies including
Affiliated Computer Services now owned by Xerox and eFunds who have been massive
beneficiaries, particularly now that recipients are issued debit cards or EBTs
(Electronic Benefit Transfers) rather than the old-style paper chits.
A September 2012 study by the Government
Accountability Institute looked at profiteering by corporations that managed
the government's food stamp program. The study noted that there are
several streams of income for the aforementioned three companies from their
participation in SNAP:
1.) The Cost Per Case Month or CPCM:
Every month, the company is paid a fee for each individual enrolled in
SNAP, ranging from $0.65 to $1.45 depending on the state. The fee can be
higher if the state government decides to have the contractor distribute
multiple welfare services on a single EBT card (i.e. TANF and SNAP).
Basically, an expansion of the number of Americans receiving SNAP
benefits translates directly into increased fees paid to JP Morgan et al.
2.) ATM Fees: When an EBT card is
used at an ATM machine, particularly a machine that is not within a company's
network, a fee is charged for withdrawing TANF cash or making a balance
inquiry. In the case of Nevada, cardholders are charged $0.85 for each withdrawal
at an out-of-network terminal.
3.) Point of Sale (POS) Machines:
States rent POS machines and pay a monthly fee to the EBT service provider.
In the case of Arizona, this fee is $14.95 per month per machine.
4.) Card Replacement Fees:
Fees are charged for lost cards.
5.) Customer Service Call Fees.
How much has all of this been worth
to the providers? Between 2004 and 2012, 18 of the 24 states that
contracted with JP Morgan to provide welfare benefits have agreed to pay
$560,492,596.02 in total. New York alone has a seven-year contract worth
$126.4 million.
Let's close by looking at JP Morgan's contributions to individuals and
PACs since 1990:
Since 1990, JP Morgan has
contributed $32.215 million to election campaigns, most of it since 2003 when
it acquired its Electronic Financial Services subsidiary from Citicorp
Electronic Financial Services. Major recipients of JP Morgan's
largess include the following members of the Senate Committee on
Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry who are responsible for administering SNAP:
Mitch McConnell - $159,750 since
1989
Kirsten Gillibrand - $161,700 since
1989
Overall, the top recipient of funds
from JP Morgan was Barack Obama who received a significant $1,211,644 compared
to "only" $962,246 for his opponent, Mitt Romney.
JP Morgan has also spent $82.388
million on lobbying since 1999 as shown on this graphic:
Even though the business is highly
profitable, according to Reuters, in early 2014, JP Morgan is
threatening to exit the government prepaid card business because of the
risks associated with these products including the hacking of personal data and
the mailing out of incorrect replacement cards in Connecticut.
Big banks, Big Business, Big Government, all working together against the masses. But we(the masses) will continue to think we have a choice in voting for a Repblican or Democract...it's sad really.
ReplyDeleteNear the end of 2013 Washington talked about cutting some funding for the SNAP program. I pointed out those that will suffer the most is the grocery stores as their profits drop. This would also hurt the GDP and slow the false growth fueled by massive government spending. Thanks for highlighting how this all feeds back into the economy. Below is a link to the article I wrote at the time.
ReplyDeletehttp://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/10/food-stamps-and-snap-to-get-squeezed.html