Updated April 2016
The long conflict in Iraq, Syria and Yemen has once again brought the divisions in the Islamic world to the forefront. While many of us in the West look at all Muslims as though they are the same, this is far from factual. In fact, as in the case of Christianity with its Catholic - Protestant divide, during its long history, Islam has experienced divisions among its members, none more significant than the Sunni - Shia divide.
The long conflict in Iraq, Syria and Yemen has once again brought the divisions in the Islamic world to the forefront. While many of us in the West look at all Muslims as though they are the same, this is far from factual. In fact, as in the case of Christianity with its Catholic - Protestant divide, during its long history, Islam has experienced divisions among its members, none more significant than the Sunni - Shia divide.
Even though both branches of Islam
have the same basic belief system, the differences between the two groups have
been responsible for centuries of sectarian violence and infighting. Both groups
believe that the Prophet Muhammed was the messenger of God and that Muslims must
abide by his revelations as recorded in the Quran. As well, both groups
follow the five pillars of Islam including the hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca), the
salat (five daily prayers), the shahada (reciting the creed "There is no
God but Allah and Muhammed is his Prophet) and the sawm (fasting from sunrise
to sunset during Ramadan). Today the differences between the two groups
can be boiled down to one key difference; Sunnis believe that only the prophets
in the Quran should be given exalted status whereas Shiites venerate their
imams. This results in Sunnis having a less powerful religious hierarchy
than Shiites.
The roots of the split between the
Sunni and Shiite sects of Islam harken back to disagreements over who would be
the successor to the Prophet Muhammed after he died in 632 A.D. The basic
split occurred on whether the successor would be a member of Muhammed's
bloodline or a qualified and pious individual who would follow the Prophet's
customs. The community leaders had two choices:
1.) Abu Bakr who was a companion of
the Prophet Muhammed but was not in his bloodline.
2.) Ali ibn Abi Talib who was the
Prophet's cousin and the husband of the Prophet's daughter Fatima.
The community leadership chose Abu
Bakr as the first Caliph or successor. Ali, although he played a
significant role in the Prophet's life, was not chosen as leader because he did
not have the necessary seniority in the tribal system. Ali's followers,
however, considered Abu Bakr and the next two caliphs to be illegitimate and
that Muhammed had selected Ali as his successor. Those who supported Ali
were known as "shi'at Ali" or "supporters of Ali" which
later became known as Shi'a or Shiites. Those who became the majority of
Muslims eventually became known as "Sunni" which means
"followers of (the Prophet's) customs (sunna)".
In 656 A.D., followers of Ali took
matters into their own hands and assassinated the third Caliph Uthman and Ali
took his place as Caliph. Ali was assassinated five years later in 661
A.D. near Najaf (in modern Iraq) and his son, Hussein (Muhammed's grandson),
died in 680 A.D. fighting what he saw as a corrupt and tyrannical Sunni caliph
at Karbala (also in Iraq). Here is a map showing the location of both
cities in Iraq:
This is why the twin holy cities of
Najaf and Karbala are so important to Shia followers. Hussein's death is
still commemorated by ritual self-flagellation in a remembrance known as
"Ashura". On top of Hussein's death, Ali's son Hassan died in 670 A.D. under the
suspicion that he was poisoned by the Sunni caliph.
That's enough history. Let's look at Islam today.
Today, the majority of the world's
Muslims are Sunni, comprising between 85 and 90 percent of the total Muslims in the world compared to only 10 to 15 percent of Muslims who follow Shiite beliefs. The
Shiite branch is the majority in Iran, Iraq, Bahrain and Azerbaijan. As
well, there are significant numbers of Shiites in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.
On top of the split between Sunni
and Shiite, each branch has its own divisions. The Sunni branch has more
prominent internal divisions than the Shiite branch. One key movement in
Sunni is Wahhabism, a puritanical movement that is one of the most pervasive
movements in Islam since the 18th century. It is this group that has a
close relationship to the Saudi ruling family stemming back to the 18th century
alliance between Muhammad ibn Saud, the founder of the modern Saudi dynasty, and
Abd al-Wahhab, the scholar who encouraged a return to the fundamentals of
Islam. The most conservative Wahhabi followers believe that both Shiites
and non-Wahhabi Muslims are heretics. After the Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan and the Shiite uprising in Iran, Saudi Arabia's ruling family began
to actively promote their Wahhabi brand of Islam around the world. On the
other hand, Shia Muslims are divided into two main sects which includes
"Twelvers" who believe that there were 12 infallible imams who were
descended from Ali and were appointed by God. This group expects the 12th
imam to return at some point in time. The Ismaili sect of Shiites recognizes only
the first seven imams; the seventh being named Ismail. This group
established powerful ruling states until the 16th century and played an very important role in Islamic history.
Now let's look at today's issues in
Iraq where ISIS has made great strides in taking over control of a great deal of territory. In Iraq, the relationship between the two branches of Islam has been greatly
complicated by the dramatic end of the Sunni-dominated regime of Saddam
Hussein. The sudden removal of centuries of Sunni control stirred up
old disputes and opened old wounds that existed between the Sunnis and
the Shiites. This resulted in the creation of insurgent groups that have
battled each other as well as intra-sect infighting. The delicate balance of power that existed In Iraq under the
strong hand of Saddam Hussein was destroyed and the chances of peaceful
co-existence ended. The end result - thousands of civilian deaths.
The western powers that entered Iraq
in 2003 either chose to ignore centuries of Islamic tensions in the region or
were ignorant of the differences between the Shiites and the Sunnis. To
both groups, what happened centuries ago is still as fresh as though it
happened yesterday. Attempts by western forces intervene in this conflict
will continue to be a no-win situation. The fact that the fight is taking place on Shia holy ground complicates the issue greatly and makes any solution to the current violence in Iraq insolvable.
Good article, they will never stop killing each other
ReplyDeleteI see the West has having only two real choices. One is stay out completely. The other is pick a side. Personally I would go with the Shia even though they are outnumbered 10 to 1. Shias are the lesser of two evils. They have shown many times to be more tolerant of other religions. The one thing we can't do is pretend that radical sunni Islam isnt a western problem. They are slowly gaining footholds all across Europe and the US. At some point unless the West just converts to Islam we will have to fight.
ReplyDeleteWell, there was the little kidnapping the embassy staff in Terran thing.
Deleteshias are currently only protectors of christian population in the middle east.usa and western powers are financing and protecting sunnis for political reasons,so west is exterminating christians on MDE.logic or profit?would they sold you tommorow standing at the western soil?of course they would.i'm calling catolics of the west now to explain why they we're destroying Balkan ortodox serbs in the 90's since they we're last true defenders of europe's backyard.AQ is allready in Kosovo.who's next for the blast?greetings to all people in the world who's god is inside their hearts and common sence and nowhere else...
ReplyDeleteyou forget that American ideosyncratic protestant fundamentalism does not recognise non-Protestants as Christian ... in fact, as 'old' vs 'new' Christins i.e., Protestants, Catholic, Orthodox, Copts, etc. are the enemy that cannot be recognised or accepted into the fold, especially if they are Black, Arab or of other non Northwestern European origin ... crazy but a fact
DeleteYou fail to mention the largest and most peaceful muslim group. The non-wahhabi, non-shia Sunni muslims. Islam was largely spread by the sufi saints venerated by the sunnis who followed a religion of compassion, accommodation and teaching the love of the creator.
ReplyDeleteToday most muslims everywhere in the world are descendents of this group. They are not Salafis / Wahhabis with their narrow minded puritanical agenda, nor do they believe in the divine infallibility like the Shias. Unfortunately it is this silent group which has no representation in the world and are victims of prejudice created due to the activities of the other groups.
Agreed, however, it seems that Nakshibandi Sufis have joined ISIL in their jihad against Shia .. remember the Ottomans were Sunni & Sufi but with centuries of conflict with Saffavis, who conquered then converted Iranians to 12er Shia ... so too, most of the Chechens are Sufi, thus as you open Pandora's box there is no straight forward simple categorizatoin a vs b
DeleteAmericans fear history & live in a bubble of perpetual 'now' looking ahead towards more of more ... ignoring other peoples and their histories... is part of the exceptionalist mentality that goes along with WASP ness, belief, albeit even subconscious that they are god's chosen people predestined to the continent as their promised land & thus have a god given right as better than others, to ignore or destroy any who oppose submitting to the US ordained rule of its own form of capitalism woven into both a US dominated global political economy & a cultural superiority
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete