Updated October 2016
An interesting brief by William Frey at the Brookings Institute looks at how demographics is impacting the American political scene. This demographic divergence is becoming particularly critical as the age of the candidates offering for President of the United States bridges the gap across two generations, from the early forties to the later sixties.
An interesting brief by William Frey at the Brookings Institute looks at how demographics is impacting the American political scene. This demographic divergence is becoming particularly critical as the age of the candidates offering for President of the United States bridges the gap across two generations, from the early forties to the later sixties.
In the last two
presidential elections, young voters and those from racial minorities tended to
vote for the Democrats while older voters tended to vote for Republicans.
As well, the presidential candidates of both parties tended to reflect
their respective party bases; the younger Barak Obama and the older John McCain
and Mitt Romney. In 2012, President Obama received 80 percent of the
minority votes that were cast and Mitt Romney received ninety percent of his
votes from white voters. This voting support difference can be explained using this
graphic:
President Obama won a
larger proportion of the votes of those under the age of 45 with a 23 percent
margin for voters between the ages of 18 and 29 and a 7 percent margin for
voters between the ages of 30 and 44. Mitt Romney won a larger proportion
of the voters 45 years of age and older with a 4 percent margin for voters
between the ages of 45 and 64 and a 12 percent margin for voters aged 65 and
older.
Why did this happen?
This voter distribution occurred largely because racial minorities are
more heavily represented among younger voters, creating what William Frey
refers to as a cultural generation gap. This gap is growing more
significant; for the most part, baby boomers grew up in a time of low
immigration and segregated minorities that resulted in a society that was
relatively homogenous, particularly during the 1950s and early 1960s. As
white baby boomers and as those Americans who are older than the baby boomers
(the Silent Generation born between 1928 and 1945) have aged, they have become
more concerned with their economic well-being, becoming a more conservative
group and, in general, have become far more angry with the government and more
concerned about "big government" than either Gen Xers or Millennials
as shown on this graphic from Pew:
It is interesting to see
that the Silent Generation, who make up 17 percent of all voters and are 79
percent non-Hispanic whites, have become increasingly discontent. They
are the whitest of the generations and the least accepting of immigration and
interracial marriages as shown on this graphic:
In contrast, the younger
and more racially diverse generations are quite happy with greater government
intervention in their lives, in part, because employment opportunities are not
as abundant as they were during the 1960s and 1970s. As well, since the
majority of the Gen X and Millennial generations have been exposed to greater
numbers of immigrants, they are more open to both immigration reform and
interracial marriages.
The 2016 presidential
election cycle will be somewhat different with a white baby-boom senior
representing both the Republicans and the Democrats. Both candidates will have to work to get the votes of younger Americans who feel that they have been disenfranchised by the party elite.
No comments:
Post a Comment