As we know, the men that framed the
U.S. Constitution were aware that putting the power to declare war in the hands
of one man was dangerous. As such, delegates to the 1787 Constitutional
Convention specified that only Congress has the power to declare war under Article 1 Section 8 as shown here:
"The Congress shall have power…
To declare war, grant letters of marque
and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
To raise and support armies, but no
appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
To provide and maintain a navy;
To make rules for the government and
regulation of the land and naval forces;
To provide for calling forth the
militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel
invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and
disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be
employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states
respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training
the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress." (my bold)
Under Article II Section 2, the President of
the United States of America:
"...shall be commander in chief of
the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states,
when called into the actual service of the United States."
Congress, even with the powers
available to it, has not declared war against any foreign nation since 1942.
That begs the question, how is it that the United States has ended up at
war in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq if Congress has not declared a
state of war? In 1973, Congress enacted the War
Powers Resolution (aka the War Power's Act) as reflected in
Title 50, Chapter 33, Sections 1541 to 1548 in the aftermath of the Vietnam War
debacle, which states that:
1.) the collective judgement of both
Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of U.S. Armed Forces
into hostilities.
2.) the President must consult with
Congress before introducing U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities or situations
where hostilities are imminent.
3.) the President must comply
with reporting requirements when he introduces U.S. Armed
Forces into existing or imminent hostilities, for example, within 48 hours, he
must submit in writing a report to the Speaker of the House and the President
of the Senate a report outlining the circumstances necessitating the
introduction of U.S. Armed Forces and the scope and duration of the
involvement.
The goal of the 1973 War Powers Resolution
was to retake the power to declare war away from the President and put it back
into the collective hands of Congress.
Unfortunately, the Executive Branch
found yet another way around the law. On September 18, 2001, one short
week after the attacks of September 11th, Congress passed Public Law 107-40 which states the following:
Note that Congress, through the new
Authorization for Use of United States Armed Forces (AUMF) in Section 2 states
that :
"...the President is authorized to
use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations,
or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist
attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harboured such organizations or
persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against
the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."
In this case, the AUMF was targeting
nations, groups and individuals that were seen as supportive of the September
11, 2001 attack on U.S. soil. This AUMF was initially used to invite
Afghanistan and to justify the American attack against the Taliban and al
Qaeda and basically put all of the power to declare war into the Oval Office.
Again, in 2002, House Joint Resolution 114 was passed and
became law. Once again, this Authorization for Use of Military Force
(AUMF) was enacted, this time, with a specific target; Iraq. Among other
things, it authorized the following:
"Authorizes the President to use
the U.S. armed forces to: (1) defend U.S. national security against the
continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant Security Council
resolutions regarding Iraq."
With that background on how
declarations of war can now be undertaken when a President utilizes an Authorization
for Use of Military Forces (AUMF), let's look briefly at a study
by the Congressional Research Service showing how AUMFs have
been abused since 2001 and used as a justification for military operations in
nations that are not even part of the September 11th terrorist attack.
According to the authors of the study, there have been 37 occurrences
where the administrations of either George W. Bush or Barack Obama disclosed
publicly that they had referred to the 2001 AUMF in connection with initiating
or continuing military actions, including detentions and military trials.
Here is a partial list of the 18
occurrences when AUMFs were used during the Bush Administration:
September 24, 2001 - deployment from
Central and Pacific Command
October 9, 2001 - combat action in
Afghanistan
September 20, 2002, March 20, 2003 and
September 19, 2003 - combat and deployment action in Afghanistan, Philippines,
Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, conducting detention operations in Guantanamo Bay,
maritime interception operations in the Central and European Command areas
March 20, 2004 - continuing combat
operations in Afghanistan, continuing detention operations in Guantanamo Bay,
working with friends and allies around the globe, continuing operations in
Georgia, deployment to Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Yemen and Eritrea, maritime
interception operations in the Central, European, Northern, Pacific and
Southern Command areas
November 4, 2004 - added military
operations in Iraq to aforementioned operations
There were additional AUMF occurrences
in May 2005, December 2005, June 2006, December 2006, June 2007, December 2007,
June 2008 and December 2008.
In total (up to May 2016, the date of
the CRS report), there were 19 occurrences during the Obama Administration,
most of which include the operations outlined in the Bush occurrences.
These notifications took place in June 2009, December 2009, June 2010,
December 2010, June 2011, December 2011, June 2012, December 2012, June 2013,
December 2013 and June 2014. The September 23, 2014 notification included
a new target as shown here:
This is how the President was able to
justify the use of U.S. forces in the battle against ISIS.
Basically, thanks to Congress and its
2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Forces, three presidents have now
been given the power to engage U.S. military personnel in overseas campaigns
under the guise of the fight against global terrorism. As though this
were not enough, a new 2018 version of the original AUMF has
been introduced to replace the 2001 and 2002 versions which would allow the
president to order the use of military force against the Taliban, al Qaeda and
the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria along with:
1.) al Qaeda in
the Arabian Peninsula
2.) Al Shabab
3.) al Qaeda in
Syria including Al Nusrah Front
4.) the Haqqani Network
5.) al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
It also allows the president to order
military operations in "new foreign countries" which means countries
other than Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Yemen or Libya.
As you can see from
this posting, the original framers of the Constitution clearly wanted to reign
in the powers of the president when it came to declaring war. Since the
attack of September 11, 2001, Congress, through the use of Authorizations for
the Use of Military Forces, has abdicated its responsibility for declaring war,
giving the president a blank check when it comes to ordering U.S. military
personnel into combat.
Makes you wonder what group now controls the Congress. It is not the people of the USA. Would even 50% realize what has taken place? Thank you.
ReplyDeleteWell, how many members of congress belong to the chosen?
ReplyDeleteThe answer should tell you who controls Congress.