With President Donald
Trump threatening Syria's democratically elected leader, Bashar al-Assad, as I
am prone to do, I thought I'd take a look back in time to see if Citizen Trump's
stance on Syria is consistent now that he's Commander in Chief of the men and women who will be the boots on the ground.
Here is what Donald Trump had to
say about Syria on June 15, 2013:
To help you put the following Trump
tweets into perspective, on August
21, 2013, Syrian opposition activists claimed that a large-scale chemical
attack had taken place in both Eastern and Western Ghouta, suburbs of Damascus.
According to a United Nations investigation, survivors
of the attack suffered from the following symptoms which they attributed to the
nerve agent, sarin:
Here is Donald Trump weighing in on
the evolving Syria issue on August
29, 2013:
Here is what Donald Trump had to
say about a potential problem erupting from a U.S. attack on Syria on September
2, 2013, probably his most profound tweet of all:
Here is what Donald Trump had to
say about the involvement of the United States in Syria on September
3, 2013:
Here is Donald Trump on September 5, 2013 at 4:13 am:
Here he is once again on September 5, 2013 at 6:20 am:
All caps; he must really have meant this tweet!
...and yet again on September 5, 2013 at 4:07 pm which falls into his pattern of getting someone else to pay for what Washington does:
...and one last time on the same day at 1:45 pm, another one of his more profound tweets on the issue:
Here is Donald Trump, once again stating his views on the Syria issue on September 9, 2013:
That's the problem with the
internet; it never forgets anything, particularly when it comes to what
politicians have said, typed or thought in the past. There are a number of additional Trump tweets about Syria; it is interesting to see how he does manage to switch from one side of the debate to the other as shown in this tweet from August 28, 2013:
....and August 29, 2013, a tweet following his observation that the United States had nothing to gain by attacking Syria as noted in a tweet above:
It is rather amazing to see how
Donald Trump has done a complete 180 degree turn around in his views of what
should transpire in Syria after the latest alleged chemical attack in Douma.
Perhaps the military-industrial-intelligence complex is far more
persuasive than we might expect, or maybe its the fact that the defense
industry contributed $1.17 million to his 2016 election campaign.
While this is a small fraction of the total that was donated to the Trump
campaign in 2016, it's never too early to start thinking about fundraising for
the 2020 run for the Oval Office from one of Washington's most influential and deep-pocketed donor industries.
In closing, given the results of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, we have two questions that we should ask ourselves; will a war in Syria make lives any better for Syrians? Secondly, will a war in Syria make life any better for Americans?
In closing, given the results of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, we have two questions that we should ask ourselves; will a war in Syria make lives any better for Syrians? Secondly, will a war in Syria make life any better for Americans?
No comments:
Post a Comment