In the most recent iteration of the National Security Strategy of the United States which was published in late 2017, two nations are singled out for particular attention as shown here:
"China and Russia challenge
American power, influence, and interests, attempting to erode American security
and prosperity. They are determined to make economies less free and less fair,
to grow their militaries, and to control information and data to repress their
societies and expand their influence."
...here:
"China and Russia are developing
advanced weapons and capabilities that could threaten our critical
infrastructure and our command and control architecture."
...here:
"China and Russia want to shape a
world antithetical to U.S. values and interests. China seeks to displace the
United States in the Indo-Pacific region, expand the reaches of its
state-driven economic model, and reorder the region in its favor. Russia seeks
to restore its great power status and establish spheres of influence near its
borders."
...here:
"China and Russia began to
reassert their influence regionally and globally. Today, they are fielding
military capabilities designed to deny America access in times of crisis and to
contest our ability to operate freely in critical commercial zones during
peacetime. In short, they are contesting our geopolitical advantages and trying
to change the international order in their favor."
...and here:
"China, Russia, and other state
and non- state actors recognize that the United States often views the world in
binary terms, with states being either “at peace” or “at war,” when it is
actually an arena of continuous competition. Our adversaries will not fight us
on our terms. We will raise our competitive game to meet that challenge, to
protect American interests, and to advance our values."
In fact, China is mentioned in the
document 33 times and Russia is mentioned 25 times whereas the bogeyman of Islamic
terrorism is only mentioned twice.
Recent news out of China as reported by
the Global Times, China's English-language edition of the People's Daily
newspaper, the official mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China should send
shudders through the hallowed halls of Washington. Since the current
administration is showing little interest in co-operating with either nation
and, in fact, is making significant motions to restrain trade and impose
sanctions, the two nations are increasingly being driven into "each others
arms" in an effort to create a multipolar world, one in which America no
longer has a monopoly on world events.
Here is
the report from the Global Times at the end of May 2018:
"The armed forces of China and
Russia held their 20th round of strategic consultation in Beijing on Wednesday.
The two sides exchanged views and
reached broad consensus on current international and regional hotspot issues
and on further deepening China-Russia military cooperation under the new
circumstances.
They pledged to firmly implement the
important consensus reached by leaders of the two countries, boost bilateral
military cooperation and make new contributions to pressing ahead with military
strategic cooperation."
Here is the report from the English language
version of China Military Online:
"Major General Shao Yuanming,
deputy chief of staff of the Joint Staff Department of China’s Central Military
Commission (CMC), and Colonel General Sergei Rudskoy, chief of the Main
Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, co-hosted
the consultation.
The two sides indicated that they will
firmly implement the important consensus reached by President Xi Jinping and
President Putin, further enhance the level of bilateral military cooperation
and make positive efforts to help the strategic cooperation between the two
militaries to take new steps in the new stage."
Let's look at the might of the world's number two and number three military powers. In combination, the two nations have
the following military might according to Global
Firepower with U.S. capabilities in brackets:
Active Personnel: 3.197 million (1.282
million)
Reserve Personnel: 3.203 million (0.801
million)
Reaching Military Age: 20.905 million
(4.22 million)
Fighter Aircraft: 1,943 (1,962)
Attack Aircraft: 2,943 (2,830)
Attack Helicopters: 792 (973)
Combat Tanks: 28,016 (5,884)
Armoured Fighting Vehicles: 36,400
(38,822)
Rocket Projectors: 5,866 (1,197)
Self-propelled Artillery: 7,970 (950)
Aircraft Carriers: 2 (20)
Destroyers: 42 (65)
Submarines: 135 (66)
Mine Warfare Vessels: 76 (11)
Here is a graphic showing how much the top 15 nations spent on their military in 2015:
While spending on America's military is nearly three times what Russia and China spend in combination, sometimes you get more for less, particularly in America's highly profitable military-industrial complex.
As you can see from these statistics,
there is no doubt that a combined Russia - China military would be a force to
be reckoned with, particularly in a two-front battle, a situation similar to
the two-front reality that Germany faced in 1944. The evolving
ostracization of both nations by the United States has the potential to create
a unified powerhouse that will make it increasingly likely that the unipolar
world of the 1990s and 2000s will come to a painful end.
Well written. Thanks. Us military might is insignificant when it come down to nuclear powers.
ReplyDeleteThe real and only power the us has is the fragile belief that the dollar has value.
If this article is trying to indicate the power of the two Counties combined as allies going up against the US alone well sure, but the article seems to leave out the US allies and what they might bring to the table as well - Britain, France, & Japan. So, I wouldn't assume a victor; although there wouldn't be any victors at that point anyhow.
ReplyDeleteMerika has no real allies, no f'king way uk/fr/jp will back merika...
DeleteI standing on the middle, when war is going ..
ReplyDeleteThen lets also add the considerable military mught of Iran and North Korea.
ReplyDeleteEgypt would likely side with Russia has huge military.Also India massive military. World war wont be like the last one on many different levels.
List does not go to frigates and powerful corvettes of which Russia and China far outnumber in both firepower and units.
ReplyDelete