Updated February 2015
With the continuing hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, it is interesting to see how prepared Ukraine is to defend itself, particularly when its state of military readiness is compared to that of Russia. When reading through this posting, it is important to keep in mind that Ukraine inherited much of its materiel from the former Soviet Union.
With the continuing hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, it is interesting to see how prepared Ukraine is to defend itself, particularly when its state of military readiness is compared to that of Russia. When reading through this posting, it is important to keep in mind that Ukraine inherited much of its materiel from the former Soviet Union.
According to Global Firepower, Ukraine's military strength
ranks 21st in the world as shown on this list of the top 25 nations:
To ascertain a nation's Power Index,
Global Firepower considers several key factors:
1.) Geographical factors.
2.) Use and production of natural
resources.
3.) Ranking does not depend on the
total number of weapons available for use.
4.) Nuclear capability is not
considered.
5.) Land-locked nations are not
penalized for not having naval capabilities.
6.) Current political and military
leadership is not taken into account.
Here are some key statistics for
both nations:
1.) Manpower
- 160,000 front line personnel and
1,000,000 active reserve personnel.
- 15,686,055 fit for service.
By way of comparison, Russia has
766,000 active front line personnel and 2,485,000 active reserve personnel with
46,812,553 considered fit for service.
2.) Land Systems
- 4,112 tanks.
- 6,431 armoured fighting vehicles.
- 1,203 self-propelled guns.
- 1,000 towed artillery pieces.
- 626 rocket projectors including the Buk missile system, allegedly responsible for the Malaysian Air crash, which looks like this:
By way of comparison, Russia has 15,500
tanks (the most in the world, surpassing the 8,325 American tanks by a very
wide margin), 27,607 armoured fighting vehicles (again, the most in the world,
surpassing the 25,782 American AFVs), 5,990 self-propelled guns (compared to
only 1,934 American guns), 4,625 towed artillery pieces (compared to only 1,791
American artillery pieces) and 3,781 multiple launch rocket systems including the Buk M-1 as noted above (again, the
most in the world, surpassing the 1,330 American MLRS).
3.) Air Power
- 400 total aircraft
- 93 helicopters
By way of comparison, Russia has
3,082 military aircraft, paling in comparison to 13,683 American aircraft which
puts the U.S. firmly in the number one in the world by a very wide margin when
measured in terms of air superiority. Russia has 973 military helicopters,
again paling in comparison to the 6,012 American helicopters which puts the
U.S. in first place once again.
4.) Naval Power
- 25 military watercraft total
strength.
- 7 Corvettes.
- 1 Frigate.
- 1 Submarine.
- 2 Coastal Craft.
- 4 Mine Warfare Craft.
Russia has 352 military naval ships
in total, compared to 473 for the United States. The Russian fleet
includes 74 Corvettes, 4 Frigates, 63 submarines, 65 coastal craft and 34 mine
warfare craft. Note that Ukraine has no aircraft carriers compared to one
remaining Russian carrier that is currently in service, the Admiral Kuznetsov, built in 1991. The
Kuznetsov was deployed to the Mediterranean in 2013 on a "training
mission", however, it was felt that its relocation was due to the ongoing
tensions in Syria. It is also key to note that the Russian Black Sea fleet is
concentrated at Sevastopol where Russia has a renewable lease that expires in
2017.
Ukraine's defense budget in 2013 was
$4.88 billion dollars compared to $76.6 billion for Russia and $612.5 billion
for the United States, putting the U.S. in number one spot by a wide margin
over number two military spender, China at $126 billion.
While Global Firepower does not
include nuclear weapons in its rankings, it is interesting to note that when
the Soviet Union broke up, Ukraine inherited the world's third largest nuclear weapons stockpile after
Russia and the United States. On top of the nuclear materiel, about one-third
of Soviet military industry was located on Ukrainian soil which employed about
40 percent of Ukraine's working age population. Ukraine inherited
approximately 1900 strategic nuclear warheads and 2500 tactical nuclear weapons
including 130 SS-19 and 46 SS-24 ICBMs, each armed with ten nuclear weapons and
a total of 44 strategic bombers equipped with air-launched cruise missiles.
After years of negotiation, Ukraine transferred all of its nuclear
warheads to Russia by May 21, 1996 and by January 2002, all strategic bombers
on Ukrainian territory had been dismantled, converted to non-military use or
transferred to Russia in exchange for cancellation of Ukraine's outstanding
natural gas debt. As well, all ICBMs had been eliminated or disassembled
and all ICMB missile silos had been destroyed. In return, Ukraine
received $500 million in U.S. financial assistance for nuclear dismantlement.
While Ukraine does have small deposits of uranium, it is reliant on
Russian infrastructure for nuclear fuel enrichment and fabrication.
With this information in mind,
unless Ukraine receives substantial military aid from an outside government or
Russia feels the strain of increasing political and economic isolation, the
actual battle for Ukraine will continue to be long and painful, particularly to the nation's civilian population. One also has to wonder if Ukraine's leadership now regrets its decision to relinquish control of what could have proved to be a very effective nuclear deterrent.
It is important to note that the Ukraine relinquished its nuclear arsenal only after it received security guarantees from the US, UK, and France (the Budapest memorandum on Ukraine). Countries around the world are watching this situation unfold, and they will see whether or not these countries are to be trusted when they issue a promise to back the territorial integrity of another. It is beginning to look like such a guarantee is not binding on the West for more than 15 years.
ReplyDeleteUh. II believe you will find it is Russia that has violated Ukrainians territorial integrity (to put it mildly).
DeleteRussia were also party to the memorandum.
President Putin's speech to the Federal Assembly in English
ReplyDeletehttp://vineyardsaker.blogspot.ru/2014/03/president-putins-speech-to-federal.html
http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/6889
"The Vineyard of the Saker"
ReplyDelete"How the US dream of world supremacy was buried in Crimea"
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.ru/2014/03/these-are-official-results-from.html
It is interesting to note how far down Iran is on the list of military power.
ReplyDeleteIran has a Treaty with Russia. Russia can bring troops. The US and the NATO lose the war to Iran, if Vladimir V. Putin deems it necessary to protect Russia's interests in Iran.
DeleteAir superiority>Land Also combined NATO strength is much more than enough to obliterate Russia, one on one RU has a chance vs US, but NATO, no way man.
DeleteA military is only as strong as the leadership of a country, Obama hates the Wasps in the US and Europe, it is debatable whether he would do anything anywhere.
ReplyDelete